Eliminate the 1st AND 2nd Amendments - UPDATED:

Posting Truth, Info, Questions or not believing official story Related to Mass Shooting In Newtown Connecticut at Sandy Hook Elementary School will result in arrests and prosecutions.

 

 

 

Posting Truth,Info,Questions or not believing official story Related to Mass Shooting In Newtown Connecticut at Sandy Hook Elementary School will result in arrests and prosecutions of perpetrators of WHISTLEBLOWING.

If you pay attention to what he says, he's not talking about people impersonating the killer, he said "in any form" posting what he considers disinfo.

 

This is a pathetic last ditch attempt to clamp down on info and try to salvage their official story.

 

Will these guys prosecute themselves for violating First Amendment's Rights Of The U.S. Contitution?

 

TSP Comment:

 

Okay this thing is moving very quickly on the political front, I have seen the posts of the conspiracy folks, like always, some are waaaaay out there, others are a stretch and most are ignored or easily dismissed. (And that's exactly why they don't find space here)

 

Whats up with this though? I don't ever remember the full court press we're gonna prosecute thing.

 

Kinda draws attention to it, don't you think?

 

I understand the need for information that is truthful, the media does their own investigations and many times bring facts to light the public would never have known if not for them.

 

In this day and age the independent media looks at everything with a microscope and I understand that information dumps can confuse or muddle the investigation.

 

I always take what they (Media and authorities to be honest) present with a grain of salt as we all know all information is never released. Never has been.

 

This just seems over the top, what do you think?

 

UPDATE: Watched the news conference this morning (12/17/12)with the same LT from the CT State Police, he stated there were to two active investigations into people trying to interfere and/or threaten those involved with the investigation? He wasn't specific as to who, victims, witnesses, investigators, were the target of the threat or interference.

 

Okay now I'm really interested.

 

Who would be trying to interfere or would want to threaten anyone involved?

 

Is this a case of stifling the media, a nut job trying to influence something for what ever reason, an outside entity trying to sway the investigation, or something else?